Ayache and Forsyth - Convertible Bond models

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Ayache and Forsyth - Convertible Bond models

Joseph Wang
I downloaded the papers that Ayache and Forsyth wrote on their PDE
convertible, and it looks pretty straight forward to implement once we
have the convertible bond instrument done.  The nice thing about A and F
is that it has some default models that let you get away with doing the
calculation with only one PDE rather than two.  Their full default model
requires two PDE's, but I can implement the simpler one equation default
model as a half step.

That still doesn't solve the problem of the boundary condition that
requires the stock price be less or more than some amount for a given
number of days, but I suspect that this could be put in as an odd
boundary condition.  I was wondering if anyone knows if this problem has
been worked out, or have I found myself at a cutting edge.




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Ayache and Forsyth - Convertible Bond models

Xavier.Abulker

Joseph,
There is a reference for that in Risk magazine "the chalenge of equity derivatives, RISK, technology supplement, pages, S29-31 August 1999"
I found that in http://www.defaultrisk.com/pdf__files/Convertivle%20Bonds%20w%20Mkt%20Rsk%20&%20Cr%20Rsk.pdf
"The path dependency of Japanese resettable convertible bonds is handled by Monte-Carlo but since convertible are American style instruments modelling on a tree seems appropriate"
Xavier


Joseph Wang <[hidden email]>
Sent by: [hidden email]

28/03/2005 02:47

       
        To:        [hidden email]
        cc:        
        Subject:        [Quantlib-users] Ayache and Forsyth - Convertible Bond models





I downloaded the papers that Ayache and Forsyth wrote on their PDE
convertible, and it looks pretty straight forward to implement once we
have the convertible bond instrument done.  The nice thing about A and F
is that it has some default models that let you get away with doing the
calculation with only one PDE rather than two.  Their full default model
requires two PDE's, but I can implement the simpler one equation default
model as a half step.

That still doesn't solve the problem of the boundary condition that
requires the stock price be less or more than some amount for a given
number of days, but I suspect that this could be put in as an odd
boundary condition.  I was wondering if anyone knows if this problem has
been worked out, or have I found myself at a cutting edge.




-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Quantlib-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users
*************************************************************************
Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont
confidentiels et etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires.
Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisee est interdite.
Tout message electronique est susceptible d'alteration.
La FIMAT et ses filiales declinent toute responsabilite
au titre de ce message s'il a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie.
    ********
This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and
intended solely for the addressees.
Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited.
E-mails are susceptible to alteration.  
Neither FIMAT nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates
shall be liable for the message if altered,
changed or falsified.

*************************************************************************
Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont
confidentiels et etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires.
Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisee est interdite. 
Tout message electronique est susceptible d'alteration. 
La FIMAT et ses filiales declinent toute responsabilite 
au titre de ce message s'il a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie.
     ********
This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and
intended solely for the addressees.
Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. 
E-mails are susceptible to alteration.   
Neither FIMAT nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates 
shall be liable for the message if altered, 
changed or falsified.