Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Hi all,
the CVS repository has a new address; see <http://quantlib.org/cvs.shtml> for details. I haven't tried the anonymous CVS yet; reports are welcome. Luigi ---------------------------------------- A debugged program is one for which you have not yet found the conditions that make it fail. -- Jerry Ogdin |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Hello,
On 5/16/06, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote: > I haven't tried the anonymous CVS yet; reports are welcome. I've tried anonymous access from behind a firewall without success. Under the old infrastructure, for those of us behind firewalls which block traffic on the standard ports, sourceforge provided alternate servers/ports for anonymous (pserver) and development (ssh) access: cvs-pserver.sourceforge.net 443 cvs-ssh.sourceforge.net 443 Under the new infrastructure, for developer access from behind a firewall, the updated docs say to use the standard server with an alternate port quantlib.cvs.sourceforge.net 443 and that works fine for me but as far as I can see the new docs say nothing at all about anonymous access from behind a firewall. I raised a sourceforge support request but in the meantime I'd be grateful for any ideas anyone may have. Regards, Eric |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Hi guys,
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 16:08, eric ehlers wrote: > I've tried anonymous access from behind a firewall without success. I saw the other day that source forge is offering also svn - svn supports check-in check-out operations over http/https - I've personally used such a repository behind a corporate fire wall and a proxy - it worked perfectly - if QL could switch to svn it will simplify tremendously all of us behind a firewall and/or proxies ... just my two cents cheers, Plamen |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Not to mention the fact that Subversion is loads better than CVS!
On May 16, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Plamen Neykov wrote: > Hi guys, > > On Tuesday 16 May 2006 16:08, eric ehlers wrote: >> I've tried anonymous access from behind a firewall without success. > > I saw the other day that source forge is offering also svn - svn > supports > check-in check-out operations over http/https - I've personally > used such a > repository behind a corporate fire wall and a proxy - it worked > perfectly - > if QL could switch to svn it will simplify tremendously all of us > behind a > firewall and/or proxies ... > > just my two cents > > cheers, > Plamen > ... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
On 05/16/2006 09:44:01 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
> Not to mention the fact that Subversion is loads better than CVS! I know---I'm using it already for other projects. I was thinking of making the switch in the near future, but I didn't want to hurry---unless there's serious problems with CVS, of course... Luigi ---------------------------------------- Matz's Law: A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking. |
Free forum by Nabble | Disable Popup Ads | Edit this page |