Candidate 0.9.0 tarballs
Locked
 
|
Hi all, candidate tarballs for the 0.9.0 release are available from <http://quantlib.org/prerelease/>. If you have a few spare cycles, please test them out---if no showstoppers are reported, they will be released in time for Christmas. Thanks, Luigi -- Don't say "yes" until I finish talking. -- Darryl F. Zanuck ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
Re: Candidate 0.9.0 tarballs
|
|
On 17 December 2007 at 17:48, Luigi Ballabio wrote: | | Hi all, | candidate tarballs for the 0.9.0 release are available from | <http://quantlib.org/prerelease/>. If you have a few spare cycles, | please test them out---if no showstoppers are reported, they will be | released in time for Christmas. What types of issues are you expecting? I put two of the candidates (Nov 27 and Dec 12) into Debian, and they passed on almost all arches, see the bottom of this page http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=quantlib The small arm architecture 'timed out' during the final link for the Dec 12 try, it passed for Nov 27. I suspect this to be a simple issue of lacking horsepower. Dirk -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
|
|
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 11:19 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 17 December 2007 at 17:48, Luigi Ballabio wrote: > | candidate tarballs for the 0.9.0 release are available from > | <http://quantlib.org/prerelease/>. If you have a few spare cycles, > | please test them out---if no showstoppers are reported, they will be > | released in time for Christmas. > > What types of issues are you expecting? None, I hope... Luigi -- There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. -- C. A. R. Hoare ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
Re: Candidate 0.9.0 tarballs
|
|
On 17 December 2007 at 18:28, Luigi Ballabio wrote: | | On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 11:19 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > On 17 December 2007 at 17:48, Luigi Ballabio wrote: | > | candidate tarballs for the 0.9.0 release are available from | > | <http://quantlib.org/prerelease/>. If you have a few spare cycles, | > | please test them out---if no showstoppers are reported, they will be | > | released in time for Christmas. | > | > What types of issues are you expecting? | | None, I hope... Understood :) We don't plan to release that breaks -- so let me rephrase: What changed since the last candidates were released? I.e. if everything that changed pertains to VC$whatever I won't bother getting into this as Linux behaviour looked pretty spotless to me the last time around. Hope this makes more sense, Dirk -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
|
|
On Dec 17, 2007, at 6:50 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Understood :) We don't plan to release that breaks -- so let me > rephrase: > What changed since the last candidates were released? I.e. if > everything > that changed pertains to VC$whatever I won't bother getting into this > as > Linux behaviour looked pretty spotless to me the last time around. There were a couple of bug fixes (you can look at the svn log if you're interested) which were present on all platforms, but for some reasons didn't manifest on Linux---for instance, there was an out-of-bound access in the FittedBondCurve example which the program survived unscathed. Needless to say, I'd advise including the fix in the package :) Luigi ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
|
|
Hello,
compiled tarballs with Visual Studio 2003. Got 6 errors with piecewiseyieldcurve.cpp. The errors are on the border of tolerance, but there should be now errors with the testsuite, right?
Regards,
Georgy
Testing consistency of piecewise-log-linear discount curve...
./piecewiseyieldcurve.cpp(449): error in "PiecewiseYieldCurveTest::testLogLinearDiscountConsistency": 1 year(s) BMA swap: estimated libor fraction: 0.67560104 expected libor fraction: 0.6756 error: 1.0393722e-006 tolerance: 1e-006 Testing consistency of piecewise-linear discount curve... Testing consistency of piecewise-log-linear zero-yield curve... ./piecewiseyieldcurve.cpp(449): error in "PiecewiseYieldCurveTest::testLogLinearZeroConsistency": 1 year(s) BMA swap: estimated libor fraction: 0.67560104 expected libor fraction: 0.6756 error: 1.0393708e-006 tolerance: 1e-006 Testing consistency of piecewise-linear zero-yield curve... ./piecewiseyieldcurve.cpp(449): error in "PiecewiseYieldCurveTest::testLinearZeroConsistency": 1 year(s) BMA swap: estimated libor fraction: 0.67560104 expected libor fraction: 0.6756 error: 1.0393708e-006 tolerance: 1e-006 Testing consistency of piecewise-spline zero-yield curve... ./piecewiseyieldcurve.cpp(449): error in "PiecewiseYieldCurveTest::testSplineZeroConsistency": 1 year(s) BMA swap: estimated libor fraction: 0.67560104 expected libor fraction: 0.6756 error: 1.0393708e-006 tolerance: 1e-006 Testing consistency of piecewise-linear forward-rate curve... ./piecewiseyieldcurve.cpp(449): error in "PiecewiseYieldCurveTest::testLinearForwardConsistency": 1 year(s) BMA swap: estimated libor fraction: 0.67560104 expected libor fraction: 0.6756 error: 1.0393708e-006 tolerance: 1e-006 Testing consistency of piecewise-flat forward-rate curve... ./piecewiseyieldcurve.cpp(449): error in "PiecewiseYieldCurveTest::testFlatForwardConsistency": 1 year(s) BMA swap: estimated libor fraction: 0.67560104 expected libor fraction: 0.6756 error: 1.0393708e-006 tolerance: 1e-006 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
|
|
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 23:48 +0100, Georgy Jikia wrote: > compiled tarballs with Visual Studio 2003. Got 6 errors with > piecewiseyieldcurve.cpp. The errors are on the border of tolerance Yes, I saw them too. I've increased the tolerance a bit... Thanks, Luigi > -- It is always the best policy to tell the truth, unless, of course, you are an exceptionally good liar. -- Jerome K. Jerome ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
«
Return to quantlib-dev
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |