Conclusions of the First QuantLib Conference

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Conclusions of the First QuantLib Conference

Marco Marchioro-2
Hi developers,
        this is the final version that I will submit to
quantlib-users in a couple of days.

Any last-minute change?

Marco

===============================================
Dear QuantLib user,
it is with great pleasure that I will report the conclusions of
the First QuantLib Conference in Milan, held on October 20th, 2002.

There were participants from the major European countries.
The meeting started with a visit to the facilities of RiskMap,
the major sponsor of QuantLib, where coffee and water were served.

Soon afterwards the discussion begun in a single session with
all the participants very active in the debate. Here's
a list of all the major conclusions.

+Changes to the Web Site
   * Improve documentation, maybe add a weblog where QL developers can
     leave short progress notes
   * Update the "to do" list
   * Draw a road map of future works

+Importance of Unit Testing
   The idea is to certify the quality of QuantLib using a unit-test framework.
   The tests would also serve as concrete examples on how the library should
   be used.
   QuantLib would be defined by what is tested, all the major features should
   be tested. In this way it will also be possible to maintain the
synchronization
   of QuantLib with QuantLib.NET.
   All the tests done in python will be copied to corresponding tests
written in C++.

+Changes to the Library
   * Improve the documentation
   * Move to the Instrument/pricing engine framework
   * Refactor of the Finite-Difference framework merging with
     the Tree/Lattice framework
   * Develop a framework for stochastic processes
   * Build basic Bond classes

In particular the last point, build basic Bond classes, needs volunteers.

Afterwards, the meeting moved to a more mundane venue where pizza was
eventually served.
Distinghishing himself for his class, the representative of the Helvetic
QuantLib
community asked for a Martini Bianco to drink with his pizza. The other
developers
enjoyed their pizza with a beer.
Later in the evening the chief architect of QuantLib astonished everybody
winning the competition of eating the biggest(they say size doesn't matter)
slice of cake.

The evening ended late at night after many more discussion about life, the
universe, everything and, of course, QuantLib.

Marco Marchioro, Milan, October 21st, 2002.



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Conclusions of the First QuantLib Conference

Ferdinando M. Ametrano-2
At 01:29 PM 10/23/2002 +0100, Marco Marchioro wrote:
>Any last-minute change?
sorry for being late. Marco, I would only suggest a more somber style, what
do you think?

>it is with great pleasure that I will report the conclusions of
>the First QuantLib Conference in Milan, held on October 20th, 2002.
what about "First QuantLib Afternoon"?. No way it was a conference ;-)

>There were participants from the major European countries.
"The participants were me, Luigi, and Nando from Milan, Sad from
Switzerland and Jens from Germany"

>The meeting started with a visit to the facilities of RiskMap,
>the major sponsor of QuantLib, where coffee and water were served.
I would leave it at "The meeting was hosted in RiskMap's office, where
coffee and water were served." "Major sponsor" would confirm the impression
that QuantLib is just a RiskMap marketing tool, something few people
already complained about in private messages.

thank you for summarizing the conclusions in such an effective way.

ciao -- Nando



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Conclusions of the First QuantLib Conference

Luigi Ballabio-2
At 03:45 PM 10/24/02 +0200, Ferdinando Ametrano wrote:
>At 01:29 PM 10/23/2002 +0100, Marco Marchioro wrote:
>>Any last-minute change?
>sorry for being late. Marco, I would only suggest a more somber style,
>what do you think?

And spoil Marco's fun? :)




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Conclusions of the First QuantLib Conference

Ferdinando M. Ametrano-2
At 05:45 PM 10/24/2002 +0200, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
>>Marco, I would only suggest a more somber style, what do you think?
>
>And spoil Marco's fun? :)
Ok I step back.

So my only remaining point is to remove "major sponsor"

ciao -- Nando