I have tried to
implement discrete dividends when
pricing an option
using finite differences scheme.
Has anyone been able
to do this?
Menzi
Mndaweni
Nedbank Capital
Equity Capital
Markets
Quantitative
Analyst
Tel
(w): +27 11 - 294 4516
Fax(w): +27
11 - 759
7021 Nedbank Limited Reg No 1951/000009/06. The following
link displays the names of the Nedbank Board of
Directors and Company Secretary.
This email is confidential and is intended for the
addressee only. The following link will take you to Nedbank's legal
notice.
|
On 03/16/2006 04:13:34 PM, Mndaweni, M. (Menzi) wrote:
> I have tried to implement discrete dividends when > pricing an option using finite differences scheme. > Has anyone been able to do this? There are a few pricers for that in the library (see the sources inside ql/PricingEngines/Vanilla) but their reliability must still be assessed. Joseph, can you step in and comment? Later, Luigi ---------------------------------------- Hofstadter's Law: It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take Hofstadter's Law into account. |
In reply to this post by Mndaweni, M. (Menzi)
On Friday 17 March 2006 08:08,you write:
> On 03/16/2006 04:13:34 PM, Mndaweni, M. (Menzi) wrote: > > I have tried to implement discrete dividends when > > pricing an option using finite differences scheme. > > Has anyone been able to do this? > > There are a few pricers for that in the library (see the sources inside > ql/PricingEngines/Vanilla) but their reliability must still be > assessed. Joseph, can you step in and comment? Yes. The default dividend vanilla fd engine in 0.3.12 produces results that replicate the standard texts for European options. Note that the default for 0.3.11 is different from the default for 0.3.11 which produces results quite different from the standard textbooks. The engine for 0.3.11 is included in 0.3.12 but you have to specifically ask for it. Look in the header files for that information. There are three caveats. 1) The first is that the engines may be incorrect for American options. The problem is that the FD engines subtract the discounted value of the dividends when issued, when in reality the amount that has to be discounted changes over time. This may (or may not) interfere with the step condition for American options. 2) The second is that I've read a paper by Haug that questions whether or not the standard practice of subtracting the discounted value of dividends to calculate the value of options is self-consistent and correct, and see Back to Basics: A new approach to the discrete dividend problem. Haug, Haug and Lewis (it is available via google) 3) If that isn't bad enough, a lot has to do with the details of the dividend issuance. The lag between the time a dividend is declared and the time it is issued changes things, as the fact that you aren't sure in advance when a dividend will also be issued also changes things. There is also a difference between fractional and fixed dividends. see "New Directions in Mathematical Finance" Paul Willmott ed. Dr. Joseph Wang China Derivatives Researcher |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |