Errors in USDLibor implementation?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Errors in USDLibor implementation?

Daniele De Francesco-2
Hi all,

I was reading the definition of the libor rates at
http://www.bba.org.uk/bba/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=225&a=1412
And the BBA states that the calendar of holidays used when the currency is
not EUR of GBP is a combined calendar of London and the major financial
center of the currency in question.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Errors in USDLibor implementation?

Wujiang Lou
Normally one needs an End_of_Month flag. When it's off, advance by  number of months; when it's on, align to month end after advancing months.
A fix will make it more "industrial strength" lib.

Daniele De Francesco wrote:

Hi all,

I was reading the definition of the libor rates at
http://www.bba.org.uk/bba/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=225&a=1412
And the BBA states that the calendar of holidays used when the currency is
not EUR of GBP is a combined calendar of London and the major financial
center of the currency in question.
From what I can see even in the most recent CVS versions, the calendar is
simply the us exchange calendar.

Also... A 1 month rate from the end of a month is defined to be a rate until
the end of the next month. According to the QuantLib implementation we are
simply advancing using ModFollow. This seems to be a problem if you look at
BBA's example fixing date date of Feb 28, whose maturity for the deposit
should be March 31st and not March 28th.

Am I misinterpreting things or is this really something that needs a fix?
-Daniele

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Quantlib-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users

--
This is not an offer (or solicitation of an offer) to buy/sell the securities/instruments mentioned or an official confirmation.  Morgan Stanley may deal as principal in or own or act as market maker for securities/instruments mentioned or may advise the issuers.  This may refer to a research analyst/research report. Unless indicated, these views are the author's and may differ from those of Morgan Stanley research or others in the Firm. We do not represent this is accurate or complete and we may not update this.  Past performance is not indicative of future returns. For additional information, research reports and important disclosures, contact me or see https://secure.ms.com.  You should not use email to request, authorize or effect the purchase or sale of any security or instrument, to send transfer instructions, or to effect any other transactions.  We cannot guarantee that any such requests received via email will be processed in a timely manner.  This communication is solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information.  We do not waive confidentiality by mistransmission.  Contact me if you do not wish to receive these communications.  In the UK, this communication is directed in the UK to those persons who are market counterparties or intermediate customers (as defined in the UK Financial Services Authority's rules).
 

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Errors in USDLibor implementation?

Daniele De Francesco-2
In reply to this post by Daniele De Francesco-2
Right.... But I'm saying that in the case of USDLibor we don't need a flag,
we know that the rolling is really a combinantion of end_of_month and
modFollow:
when the value date is on the last day of the month we use end_of_month and
otherwise modFollow.

It's weird but I think the fixing() method of USDLibor (and probably many
other indices) should be hardcoded according to these specs, which would
mean changing the declaration of fixing() in Xibor to be virtual so that it
can be overridden in USDLibor (and other indices that BBA defines)

I would also like to amend what I said before; one of the senteces should
read as follows:

"This seems to be a problem if you look at
BBA's example fixing value date of Feb 28, whose maturity for the deposit
should be March 31st and not March 28th. "

Thoughts ?

-Daniele



-----Original Message-----
From: Wujiang Lou [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:57 PM
To: Daniele De Francesco
Cc: '[hidden email]'
Subject: Re: [Quantlib-users] Errors in USDLibor implementation?


Normally one needs an End_of_Month flag. When it's off, advance by  number
of months; when it's on, align to month end after advancing months.
A fix will make it more "industrial strength" lib.


Daniele De Francesco wrote:
Hi all,
I was reading the definition of the libor rates at
http://www.bba.org.uk/bba/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=225&a=1412 
And the BBA states that the calendar of holidays used when the currency is
not EUR of GBP is a combined calendar of London and the major financial
center of the currency in question.