At 04:59 PM 9/23/03, Bill Q wrote:
>I was working with the Intruments::Swaption class, pricing a European style
>swaption. I used the EuropeanExercise class with the single excercise date
>and the BlackSwaption pricing engine. All seemed to be going well but then
>I noticed that the excercise date had no effect on the price of the
>swaption.
>
>I looked into the code and can see that the Swaption puts the excercise
>time into a vector called excerciseTimes in SwaptionArguments. However
>the BlackSwaption pricer never looks at it. Instead it sets the T (time)
>parameter to arguments_.floatingResetTimes[0] which will be the start
>of the swap. Now most examples do show the swaption excercise date to
>correspond to the start of the swap, but does it have to be so?
>
>And so my question is, in ql/Pricers/blackswaption.cpp,
>Can the line: 'Time start = arguments_.floatingResetTimes[0];'
>be changed to: 'Time start = arguments_.exerciseTimes[0];'?
Bill,
you're right, that would be the correct behavior. However, I'm
most likely to forget it as soon as I close the mailer and go back to work :)
May you file your patch on Sourceforge? The page is
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=12740&atid=312740and it is somehow guaranteed that someone will look at it between now and
next release...
Thanks,
Luigi