On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 22:23 +0100, Tim Müller-Seydlitz wrote:
> I very much welcome the new 0.4.0 release. An impressive step has been made.
Thanks. Also, let me thank in turn all users and developers which made
it possible.
> But it doesn't help to launch a firework in the cellar. Therefore, I think that
> the marketing needs to be improved.
I agree---especially since we're planning to release version 1.0 by the
end of the year. I'll try and follow up on this shortly.
> Here are some little things that should be changed:
>
> - The main page quantlib.org does not hold any information on this important update.
> -
http://quantlib.org/reference/history.html does not contain the changes. So
> -
http://quantlib.org/download.shtml needs to be updated.
I'm aware of this. Unfortunately, Sourceforge had hardware problems and
was forced to shut down shell access since last week. Thus, it is not
possible for me to update the web site at this time. Hopefully, the
access should be back in a couple of days.
> - Synchronization with quantlibxl? How are both projects synchronized? How are
> versions compatible? What can be done in the mean time?
We branched for release at about the same time, so I guess Eric is
packaging QuantLibXL 0.4.0 as we speak. I'll let him answer this one
though.
Later,
Luigi
----------------------------------------
Within C++, there is a much smaller and cleaner language struggling to
get out.
-- Bjarne Stroustrup
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
Locked
