Hi Community,
I am writing a small interface for a simulation time axis for exposures using QL. To keep the question short, I show below the function where error is reported: inline SimulationTimeAxis& SimulationTimeAxis::MergeWithOtherTimeAxis(const SimulationTimeAxis& other_axis) { exposure_dates_.insert(exposure_dates_.end(), (other_axis.exposure_dates()).begin(), (other_axis.exposure_dates()).end()); std::sort(exposure_dates_.begin(),exposure_dates_.end()); std::unique(exposure_dates_.begin(), exposure_dates_.end()); return(*this); } I get the following exception error message when testing the method: exception of type boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::gregorian::bad_year> >: Year is out of valid range: 1400..10000 And I was wondering whether anyone had already come across such error in the past. Your help is much appreciated. Thanks, Amine ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ QuantLib-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users |
Apologies if I'm asking the obvious, but did you check the dates in your axes? Are they all valid dates between years 1400 and 10000? Luigi On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:57 PM Amine Ifri <[hidden email]> wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ QuantLib-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users |
Hi Luigi,
I checked the dates on both axes. They are all valid and go on to 2037. For some reason, std::vector::insert is not working properly on them. We shouldn’t have any problem on the sort method since Date class is already endowed with a < comparison operator. Thanks for the advise. Amine
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ QuantLib-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users |
That's weird. May you try debugging the program and see what is happening when the exception is thrown? Luigi On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 4:15 PM Amine Ifri <[hidden email]> wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ QuantLib-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |