|
|
On 2003.11.24 19:16, Ferdinando Ametrano wrote:
> Getting back to an old question of yours about the templetization of
> trees: I was wondering if that in your opinion would make more
> difficult the merge of the Finite Difference framework and the
> Lattice framework, which currently includes trees.
> I would say that the merging of Finite Difference and Lattice should
> be the top priority design on that front, and would stay away from
> anything that might make this process harder.
> What your take on this issue?
They're two sides of the same coin. Either we give them both a
templated implementation, or none. Adding finite differences into the
mix shouldn't make it any more difficult than it already is :)
Later,
Luigi
|
Locked
