Hi,
after compiling the version 1.0.1 with VC9 I've got two errors with compoundoption.cpp: Testing compound-option values and greeks... ./compoundoption.cpp(315): fatal error in "QuantLib::detail::quantlib_test_case(&CompoundOptionTest::testValues)": mother option type: Put daughter option type: Call spot value: 500 strike mother: 50 strike daughter: 520 dividend yield: 3.000000 % risk-free rate: 8.000000 % reference date: May 28th, 2010 maturity mother: August 26th, 2010 maturity daughter: November 24th, 2010 volatility: 35.000000 % expected value: 21.1965 calculated value: 21.2058 error: 0.00931461 tolerance: 0.001 Testing compound-option put-call parity... ./compoundoption.cpp(200): fatal error in "QuantLib::detail::quantlib_test_case(&CompoundOptionTest::testPutCallParity)": mother option type: Call daughter option type: Call spot value: 500 strike mother: 50 strike daughter: 520 dividend yield: 3.000000 % risk-free rate: 8.000000 % reference date: May 28th, 2010 maturity mother: August 26th, 2010 maturity daughter: November 24th, 2010 volatility: 35.000000 % expected put call parity: 0 calculated put call parity: 0.134586 error: 0.134586 tolerance: 1e-008 Does anyone else get such errors? Regards, Georgy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ QuantLib-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users |
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 08:04 +0200, Georgy Jikia wrote:
> after compiling the version 1.0.1 with VC9 I've got two errors with > compoundoption.cpp: > > [...] > > Does anyone else get such errors? I don't. What configuration did you compile? And when did you run the tests? Luigi -- Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future. -- Niels Bohr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ QuantLib-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users |
It is Release (static runtime). The tests were run early in the morning today.
Georgy On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 08:04 +0200, Georgy Jikia wrote: >> after compiling the version 1.0.1 with VC9 I've got two errors with >> compoundoption.cpp: >> >> [...] >> >> Does anyone else get such errors? > > I don't. What configuration did you compile? And when did you run the > tests? > > Luigi > > > -- > > Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future. > -- Niels Bohr > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ QuantLib-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users |
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 16:21 +0200, Georgy Jikia wrote:
> It is Release (static runtime). The tests were run early in the morning today. Apologies for the delay. The same day, I ran Release with no errors. Unfortunately, I couldn't run Release (static runtime)---I didn't have the corresponding Boost libraries available. Did the tests run since? Luigi -- Newton's Law of Gravitation: What goes up must come down. But don't expect it to come down where you can find it. Murphy's Law applies to Newton's. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ QuantLib-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users |
Run the same executable (without recompilation) again: this time no errors!
So it looks like the errors were time specific. Georgy On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 16:21 +0200, Georgy Jikia wrote: >> It is Release (static runtime). The tests were run early in the morning today. > > Apologies for the delay. The same day, I ran Release with no errors. > Unfortunately, I couldn't run Release (static runtime)---I didn't have > the corresponding Boost libraries available. Did the tests run since? > > Luigi > > > > -- > > Newton's Law of Gravitation: > What goes up must come down. But don't expect it to come down > where you can find it. Murphy's Law applies to Newton's. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ QuantLib-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |