Hi All,
The prerelease files for version 1.0.1 of QuantLibAddin, QuantLibXL, ObjectHandler and gensrc are available at this link: http://sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/prerelease/ I'd be grateful to anyone who could spare some time to test the files and let me know how it goes. There was no 1.0.0 release. These files are compatible with QuantLib 1.0.0 and 1.0.1. Kind Regards, Eric =================================================== Eric Ehlers nazcatech sprl | Brussels | http://www.nazcatech.be * Distributed computing for pricing analytics * Use Microsoft Excel as a client to the Grid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
Hi Eric,
I've downloaded and tested the QuantLibXL-bin.exe release candidate: there were few workbooks which needed an update. I fixed all of them but Interpolation.xls. Interpolation.xls fails because of a broken feature: we used to be able to input a comma separated string instead of a vector of numbers, now it's not possible anymore. The code must be there somewhere and we also have the function ohStringSplit which implements that functionality in an effective way. Unfortunately nesting ohStringSplit inside a function call does not solve the issue. Could you take a look at it? The most elegant solution would probably be to just fix the call =myFunction(..., ohStringSplit(myvectorAsString, ","), ...) so that it would up to the user to do the conversion and to provide the delimiter (which is regional settings dependant) The optional next step might be to also attempt a last-resort coercion to vector<Whatever> at the C++ layer, in which case the delimiter should be the regional setting default thank you anyway ciao -- Nando ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
Hi Eric,
it seems the QuantLibXL Framework is not included in this release, as it was in 0.9.7. Does it mean the Framework will not be supported anymore? Or will it reappear in some future releases? Best regards, Georgy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
Georgy Jikia wrote:
> it seems the QuantLibXL Framework is not included in this release, as > it was in 0.9.7. > Does it mean the Framework will not be supported anymore? Or will it > reappear in some future releases? is it actively maintained by me on the trunk, since that is the version I use on daily basis. For 0.9.7 and 1.0.1 I suggested not to release it since it is not documented and, most of all, it was outdated and I don't have time and energy to support on the mailing lists something I don't use This is a structural problem because 0.9.7 is more than a year old and 1.0.x is more than 6 months old. I advocate more frequent releases, and I actually do more frequent releases for my daily work. The current trunk is stable enough for an immediate release, but Luigi prefer not to release before VC10 support is added... I can commit to share an unofficial QLXL 1.1 release (fremework included) next week. ciao -- Nando ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
As far as I remember some Quantlib functionality (e.g. LMM?) was only
available in Excel through QuantLibXL Framework. So I think those of Quantlib users, who prefer to use an Excel interface, would be definitely interested to be able to use the Framework also with a version 1.01. -- Georgy On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Ferdinando Ametrano <[hidden email]> wrote: > Georgy Jikia wrote: >> it seems the QuantLibXL Framework is not included in this release, as >> it was in 0.9.7. >> Does it mean the Framework will not be supported anymore? Or will it >> reappear in some future releases? > > is it actively maintained by me on the trunk, since that is the > version I use on daily basis. > For 0.9.7 and 1.0.1 I suggested not to release it since it is not > documented and, most of all, it was outdated and I don't have time and > energy to support on the mailing lists something I don't use > > This is a structural problem because 0.9.7 is more than a year old and > 1.0.x is more than 6 months old. I advocate more frequent releases, > and I actually do more frequent releases for my daily work. > > The current trunk is stable enough for an immediate release, but Luigi > prefer not to release before VC10 support is added... > I can commit to share an unofficial QLXL 1.1 release (fremework > included) next week. > > ciao -- Nando > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Georgy Jikia <[hidden email]> wrote:
> As far as I remember some Quantlib functionality (e.g. LMM?) was only > available in Excel through QuantLibXL Framework. not really: the QuantLib analytics available in Excel do not need the framework. The framework is an Excel-based application using those analytics, so it's more powerful than the analytics alone, but it's very fragile, complex and undocumented > So I think those of > Quantlib users, who prefer to use an Excel interface, would be > definitely interested to be able to use the Framework also with a > version 1.01. what's good about open-source it's that you can do it by yourself: check out the 1.0 branch and the framework it's there... or just wait a couple of weeks and use it in 1.1 ciao -- Nando ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
I've checked again: the problem with earlier release was, that some
broken workbooks were included, if on the installation the framework had been selected. So they did not work neither with nor without framework. If version 1.1 is going to be released in a couple of weeks, I'll just wait for it. -- Georgy On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Ferdinando Ametrano <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Georgy Jikia <[hidden email]> wrote: >> As far as I remember some Quantlib functionality (e.g. LMM?) was only >> available in Excel through QuantLibXL Framework. > > not really: the QuantLib analytics available in Excel do not need the framework. > The framework is an Excel-based application using those analytics, so > it's more powerful than the analytics alone, but it's very fragile, > complex and undocumented > >> So I think those of >> Quantlib users, who prefer to use an Excel interface, would be >> definitely interested to be able to use the Framework also with a >> version 1.01. > > what's good about open-source it's that you can do it by yourself: > check out the 1.0 branch and the framework it's there... > or just wait a couple of weeks and use it in 1.1 > > ciao -- Nando > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Georgy Jikia <[hidden email]> wrote:
> If version 1.1 is going to be released in a couple of > weeks, I'll just wait for it. yes it is, officially or informally I don't know yet, but you'll get it in a couple of weeks ciao -- Nando ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |