Ok, now that I got ql-ruby built, here is the first failure report on
non-i386. Dirk ----- Forwarded message from [hidden email] ----- Envelope-to: [hidden email] Delivery-date: Mon, 06 May 2002 22:03:15 -0500 Subject: Bug#146071: quantlib-ruby_0.3.0-1(hppa/unstable): need -ffunction-sections on hppa Reply-To: [hidden email], [hidden email] From: [hidden email] To: [hidden email] Package: quantlib-ruby Version: 0.3.0-1 Severity: important There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of quantlib-ruby_0.3.0-1 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.169 > Build started at 20020507-0347 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3.0.0), ruby (>= 1.6.7), ruby-dev (>= 1.6.7), libquantlib0-dev (>= 0.3.0), g++ [!ia64], g++-3.0 [ia64], gcc [!ia64], gcc-3.0 [ia64] [...] > g++ -shared -L/usr/lib -o QuantLibc.so quantlib_wrap.o -L. -lruby -lc -lQuantLib > /usr/bin/ld: quantlib_wrap.o(.text+0x3ef08): cannot reach 0000002e__ZN8QuantLib17FiniteDifferences23firstDerivativeAtCenterERKNS_5ArrayES3_+0, recompile with -ffunction-sections [...] > /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[1]: *** [QuantLibc.so] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/quantlib-ruby-0.3.0' > ./QuantLibc.so -> debian/quantlib-ruby/usr/lib/ruby/1.6/hppa-linux/QuantLibc.so > /usr/lib/ruby/1.6/ftools.rb:13:in `size': No such file or directory - "./QuantLibc.so" (Errno::ENOENT) > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.6/ftools.rb:13:in `syscopy' > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.6/ftools.rb:46:in `copy' > from /usr/lib/ruby/1.6/ftools.rb:147:in `install' > from setup.rb:222 > from setup.rb:203:in `call' > from setup.rb:96:in `execute' > from setup.rb:237 > Installing QuantLib-Ruby... > make: *** [install-stamp] Error 1 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppa&pkg=quantlib-ruby&ver=0.3.0-1 ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Good judgement comes from experience; experience comes from bad judgement. -- Fred Brooks |
At 10:53 PM 5/6/02 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>Ok, now that I got ql-ruby built, here is the first failure report on >non-i386. Dirk, does the main QuantLib package run "make check" after building? If it did, I suspect we would have failures from it as well... Bye, Luigi |
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 12:53:53PM +0100, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
> At 10:53 PM 5/6/02 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > >Ok, now that I got ql-ruby built, here is the first failure report on > >non-i386. > > Dirk, > does the main QuantLib package run "make check" after building? > If it did, I suspect we would have failures from it as well... Yes, but errors are ignored by my choice: test-stamp: build-stamp -$(MAKE) check touch test-stamp The '-' makes make roll over errors and continue. Dirk -- Good judgement comes from experience; experience comes from bad judgement. -- Fred Brooks |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |