On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Luigi Ballabio
<
[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:41 PM, <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>> - fixed bug in the update method: non-lazy observers received obsolete data because of calculated_ being still false
>
> I see. I hadn't though of this---probably because I think non-lazy
> observers should be taken out and shot...
I agree with you 100% and I'm trying to shot them all :-D
> Is there any chance you can find the time to write a test case for this?
Yes I can, but not in the coming 2/3 weeks
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev