Re: boost/version.hpp is missing in the CVS snapshot

[Ferdinando Ametrano-8]

At 03:16 PM 3/25/2004, you wrote:
>Hi, I just got the latest cvs snapshot of QuantLib and tried to compile it
>under XP using Visual Studio 6.0.
>  I got this error, saying qldefines.hpp that it can not open
> boost/version.hpp.

In QuantLib 0.3.5, which will be released by the end of this month, the
boost library is optional. In 0.3.6 the boost library will be mandatory.

 From the CVS trunk you have checked out QuantLib 0.3.6a0, so you are going
to need boost (www.boost.org): just download it, unzip it, and put the
boost folder in your include path. That's all

ciao -- Nando

[J Yu]

Do you tag 0.3.5 so I can check it out instead of getting the latest?
If so, what is the convention I should follow to check out 0.3.5?

Cheers!
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Ferdinando Ametrano [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 9:29 AM
To: [hidden email]
Cc: QuantLib-users
Subject: Re: boost/version.hpp is missing in the CVS snapshot

At 03:16 PM 3/25/2004, you wrote:
>Hi, I just got the latest cvs snapshot of QuantLib and tried to compile
it
>under XP using Visual Studio 6.0.
>  I got this error, saying qldefines.hpp that it can not open
> boost/version.hpp.

In QuantLib 0.3.5, which will be released by the end of this month, the
boost library is optional. In 0.3.6 the boost library will be mandatory.

 From the CVS trunk you have checked out QuantLib 0.3.6a0, so you are
going
to need boost (www.boost.org): just download it, unzip it, and put the
boost folder in your include path. That's all

ciao -- Nando

[Ferdinando Ametrano-3]

At 03:42 PM 3/25/2004, J Yu wrote:
 > Do you tag 0.3.5 so I can check it out instead of getting the latest?
 > If so, what is the convention I should follow to check out 0.3.5?
R000305f0-branch, the same pattern we used for the previous releases (see
http://quantlib.org/download.html)

ciao -- Nando