Hi Joe,
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 14:42 -0600, Joseph Wang wrote:
> Just wanted to bounce this idea off people.
>
> Right now we have
>
> QuantoVanillaOption
> QuantoForwardVanillaOption
> ForwardVanillaOption
>
> If you add in options on divdend paying stocks that's another level of
> complication.
>
> I was wondering if it would be a good idea to create the classes
>
> QuantoInstrument
> ForwardInstrument
>
> And then use multiple inheritance to compose the option classes.
>
> Alternatively we can use decorator templates in the same way that the engines
> work.
>
> Quanto<VanillaOption>
>
> Thoughts?
We tried that---the idea is surely interesting---but for some reason it
didn't seem to work. I don't remember what was the problem though. Why
don't you try prototyping it?
Later,
Luigi
----------------------------------------
There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're
talking about.
-- John von Neumann
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
Locked
Feb 24, 2007; 8:42pm
