impliedVolatility() bug

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

impliedVolatility() bug

Luigi Ballabio-2
Hi all,
        this was a nasty one. I'm flirting with the idea of fixing the  
bug on the 0.3.5 branch and re-releasing it as 0.3.6. Thoughts?

Later,
        Luigi


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: impliedVolatility() bug

Dirk Eddelbuettel
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 05:13:50PM +0200, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> this was a nasty one. I'm flirting with the idea of fixing the  
> bug on the 0.3.5 branch and re-releasing it as 0.3.6. Thoughts?

Go for it!  As they say: "Release early, release often".

No harm in finding bugs and fixing them, only in keeping'em under the carpet.

Dirk

--
The relationship between the computed price and reality is as yet unknown.  
                                             -- From the pac(8) manual page