improvment of quantlib

[Stéphane Lefranc]

Hi all,

in the toDo list i saw that improvments are to be made in the and of spline implementation.
So if someone may say to me what are the problems ill be ok to see what it returns about.
http://stephane.lefranc.free.fr/Splines/splines.pdf

thx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev

[Luigi Ballabio]

On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 19:40 +0200, Stéphane Lefranc wrote:
> in the toDo list i saw that improvments are to be made in the and of
> spline implementation.
> So if someone may say to me what are the problems ill be ok to see
> what it returns about.

Hello Stéphane,
        I was hoping that whoever wrote the todo item answered, but no such
luck, it seems.

Anyway, from the todo list (just to be sure, you're referring to
<http://quantlib.org/reference/todo.html>, right?) it looks like there
are a couple of schemes and boundary conditions that are included in the
enumeration but are not in fact implemented (the class throws an
exception if asked for them.)  So there are not problems as such; it's
just that those methods should be written.

Later,
        Luigi


--

Hofstadter's Law:
It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take
Hofstadter's Law into account.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev