Bugs item #2534054, was opened at 2009-01-25 00:57
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lballabio
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112740&aid=2534054&group_id=12740Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>Assigned to: Luigi Ballabio (lballabio)
Summary: Line 409: svd.cpp
Initial Comment:
The comparison (I think) is against p-1, not p.
ks starts at p-1 and goes backwards so it can NEVER be equal to p anyway.
- Damian
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Luigi Ballabio (lballabio)
Date: 2009-02-17 10:57
Message:
It looks like an excess of caution. The comparison against p is, I think,
so that we don't access the e array out of bounds. As you say, it's not
going to happen since ks starts at p-1. But it doesn't hurt either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Luigi Ballabio (lballabio)
Date: 2009-01-26 10:40
Message:
Do you mean line 309?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112740&aid=2534054&group_id=12740------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
Locked
