quantlib-swig patches?

[Joe Malicki-3]

About a month ago I uploaded several  patches to quantlib-swig to make
its coverage of QuantLib more complete (Tracker 2433245 and 2433147)
and had a few more speculative ones where the right solutions aren't
clear in the wings.

Is there interest in making the SWIG bindings of QuantLib more
complete?  Or is this not the right way to contribute?

Just curious for feedback, as I think this project is great and I'd
like to give back a lot more - both to the SWIG port, because I tend
to prefer to make the "higher level" program in Python for
prototyping, experimentation, and
integration with data sources etc., and the C++ with more models - but
am wondering how to contribute?

Thanks!
Joe Malicki

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev

[Luigi Ballabio]

On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 00:32 -0500, Joe Malicki wrote:
> About a month ago I uploaded several  patches to quantlib-swig to make
> its coverage of QuantLib more complete (Tracker 2433245 and 2433147)
> and had a few more speculative ones where the right solutions aren't
> clear in the wings.
>
> Is there interest in making the SWIG bindings of QuantLib more
> complete?  Or is this not the right way to contribute?

It's the right way.  It's just that lately I haven't been able to find
much time to apply the patches.  Sorry for the delay.

Luigi


--

The first rule of intelligent tinkering is to save all the parts.
-- Paul Erlich



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev

[Joe Malicki-3]

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Luigi Ballabio
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 00:32 -0500, Joe Malicki wrote:
>> About a month ago I uploaded several  patches to quantlib-swig to make
>> its coverage of QuantLib more complete (Tracker 2433245 and 2433147)
>> and had a few more speculative ones where the right solutions aren't
>> clear in the wings.
>>
>> Is there interest in making the SWIG bindings of QuantLib more
>> complete?  Or is this not the right way to contribute?
>
> It's the right way.  It's just that lately I haven't been able to find
> much time to apply the patches.  Sorry for the delay.
>
> Luigi

Thanks!

-joe

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev