Login  Register

Re: Problem testing [Re: Final tarballs]

Posted by Liguo Song on Aug 27, 2003; 3:15pm
URL: http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/Final-tarballs-tp10320p10322.html

Hi, Dirk,

I was just pulling my hair off for another problem with quantlib-test-suite. My
RPM packages build fine, but when running quantlib-test-suite, it runs through
all the tests, but ends up with the following error message:

     !!!FAILURES!!!
     Test Results:
     Run:  64   Failures: 0   Errors: 1


     1) test: Testing Monte Carlo European engines against analytic results (E)
      "McSimulation::value : max number of samples exceeded"


Right now, the quantlib-test-suite is a little out of my reach. Any input?

BTW, if it helps, I am building the final tar balls that Luigi mentioned
previously.

Liguo


Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:

> Using the exact same settings, compiler versions, ... as yesterday on the
> previous golden master, I now fail when running make check.  I first noticed
> it from the build log and, to exclude any terminal settings issues, re-ran it.
>
> It dies here:
>
> /usr/bin/make  check-TESTS
> make[3]: Entering directory home/edd/src/debian/QuantLib-0.3.3/test-suite'
>                    
>                     Testing can never demonstrate the absence
>                    of errors in software, only their presence.
>                                            -- W.E. Dijkstra
>  
> ======================
> Testing QuantLib 0.3.3
> ======================
> Testing joint calendars...
> Testing cap/floor dependency on
> strike...lt-quantlib-test-suite: relocation error: lt-quantlib-test-suite:
> undefined symbol:
> _ZN8QuantLib9CashFlows24FloatingRateCouponVectorERKSt6vectorIdSaIdEERKNS_4DateES8_iRKNS_8CalendarENS_17RollingConventionERKNS_6HandleINS_7Indexes5XiborEEEiS5_S8_
> FAIL: quantlib-test-suite
> ===================================================
> 1 of 1 tests failed
> Please report to [hidden email]
> ===================================================
>
> I will hold back the upload til I here from Luigi. As I noted, all 62 of
> these passed with flying colours yesterday.
>
> Liguo: I guess we could compare g++ et al version off-line if this works
> for you. I am running Debian unstable, g++ is at 3.3.2-0pre1.
>
> Dirk
>