Re: Problem testing [Re: Final tarballs]

Posted by Dirk Eddelbuettel on Aug 27, 2003; 4:26pm
URL: http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/Final-tarballs-tp10320p10324.html

On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:14:08PM -0500, Liguo Song wrote:

> Hi, Dirk,
>
> I was just pulling my hair off for another problem with
> quantlib-test-suite. My RPM packages build fine, but when running
> quantlib-test-suite, it runs through all the tests, but ends up with the
> following error message:
>
>     !!!FAILURES!!!
>     Test Results:
>     Run:  64   Failures: 0   Errors: 1
>
>
>     1) test: Testing Monte Carlo European engines against analytic results
>     (E)
>      "McSimulation::value : max number of samples exceeded"

Interesting. I don't get that -- the test suite runs fine once the package
is installed. It just doesn't from 'make check'. I get

[...]
Testing old-style Monte Carlo single-factor pricers...
Testing old-style Monte Carlo multi-factor pricers...

OK (64 tests)


Dirk

>
> Right now, the quantlib-test-suite is a little out of my reach. Any input?
>
> BTW, if it helps, I am building the final tar balls that Luigi mentioned
> previously.
>
> Liguo
>
>
> Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> >Using the exact same settings, compiler versions, ... as yesterday on the
> >previous golden master, I now fail when running make check.  I first
> >noticed
> >it from the build log and, to exclude any terminal settings issues, re-ran
> >it.
> >
> >It dies here:
> >
> >/usr/bin/make  check-TESTS
> >make[3]: Entering directory home/edd/src/debian/QuantLib-0.3.3/test-suite'
> >                    
> >                    Testing can never demonstrate the absence
> >                   of errors in software, only their presence.
> >                                           -- W.E. Dijkstra
> >  
> >======================
> >Testing QuantLib 0.3.3
> >======================
> >Testing joint calendars...
> >Testing cap/floor dependency on
> >strike...lt-quantlib-test-suite: relocation error: lt-quantlib-test-suite:
> >undefined symbol:
> >_ZN8QuantLib9CashFlows24FloatingRateCouponVectorERKSt6vectorIdSaIdEERKNS_4DateES8_iRKNS_8CalendarENS_17RollingConventionERKNS_6HandleINS_7Indexes5XiborEEEiS5_S8_
> >FAIL: quantlib-test-suite
> >===================================================
> >1 of 1 tests failed
> >Please report to [hidden email]
> >===================================================
> >
> >I will hold back the upload til I here from Luigi. As I noted, all 62 of
> >these passed with flying colours yesterday.
> >
> >Liguo: I guess we could compare g++ et al version off-line if this works
> >for you. I am running Debian unstable, g++ is at 3.3.2-0pre1.
> >
> >Dirk
> >
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Quantlib-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
>

--
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
                                                -- Groucho Marx