Posted by
enrico.sirola on
Nov 04, 2003; 2:53am
URL: http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/Visual-C-settings-tp10388p10391.html
Ciao Gigi,
sorry for the delay...
>>>>> "Gigi" == Luigi Ballabio <
[hidden email]> writes:
Gigi> Ciao Enrico,
[...]
>> By the way, I also completely agree with the three proposals
>> you posted some time ago (boost smart pointers, flattening name
>> spaces - how about shortening it too? QL:: or ql:: seems nice,
>> and template lattice framework).
Gigi> Well, you can agree with the first two (and as for the
Gigi> second, we can use namespace aliases, so we can have
Gigi> QuantLib, QL and ql too) but as for the third, I was in
Gigi> doubt between two alternatives---which one is the one you're
Gigi> agreeing with?
finally i had the time to read again the original message and took a
(quick) look at the code.
While looking at the use cases you wrote, it doesn't seems that the
code using the template framework is/should be more complicated from a
user point of view. What we should ask ourselves for is: do we need to
switch from a pricing engine to another at runtime? If not, I would go
for the template framework (I'm not a template enthusiast - I just
like the +300% speed gain).
So I'm afraid I responded your question with another question.
Hope it helps,
enrico
--
Enrico Sirola <
[hidden email]>