Posted by
Luigi Ballabio on
URL: http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/Re-QuantLib-svn-SF-net-SVN-quantlib-14226-trunk-QuantLib-tp11560p11566.html
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 11:59 +0100, Ferdinando Ametrano wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Luigi Ballabio
> <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Yes, but how many times are we going to change the interfaces again?
> enough to care about, in my opinion. Of course your mileage might vary...
Aren't we supposed to release a stable 1.0 this year? "Stable" as in
"client code should keep working with later releases without changes"?
Ok, we can postpone joining the headers until we're close to freeze.
But after that, I would value more grouping related classes to make
their relationship clear, or making immediately clear to a user looking
at schedule.hpp that a MakeSchedule class is available. After all, the
recompilation problem affects only a handful of users---you, me, and a
few others that work on the repository; most users just build the
released library once.
Luigi
--
A programming language is low-level when its programs require attention
to the irrelevant.
-- Alan Perlis
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev