Re: Why not boost random numbers?

Posted by Luigi Ballabio on
URL: http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/Why-not-boost-random-numbers-tp12868p12873.html

On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 13:25 +0200, Dima wrote:
> A closer alignment to the existing boost classes in future projects
> would definitely would be a good idea.

Yes, it would---especially since they made it into TR1 and will probably
be part of the next C++ standard.  As usual, we lacked time (and unless
I'm very mistaken, it's going to be hard to find it before 1.0 is
frozen.)

Luigi


--

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and
remove all doubt.
-- Abraham Lincoln



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev