Re: Question to the Leap function in the Date class

Posted by Ferdinando M. Ametrano-3 on
URL: http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/Question-to-the-Leap-function-in-the-Date-class-tp13132p13135.html

>        with this change, one need to link the binary Boost.Date library with
> QuantLib (whereas before this, the library only needed the Boost
> headers.)
>
> I might be fine with this if we used Boost.Date to implement most of our
> Date class, but I wouldn't introduce the dependency just for checking
> leap years beyond 2200...

I agree. I didn't notice the (auto-)linking.
Actually I jumped to this modification in the hope to trigger further
boostification, but this is another issue and would require a stronger
determination

ciao -- Nando

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev