Posted by
Ferdinando M. Ametrano-3 on
URL: http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/default-0-Days-value-for-Period-in-QLXL-tp13153p13155.html
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Luigi Ballabio
<
[hidden email]> wrote:
> Would it be feasible to use a little adapter class in QLA?
It would, but it's probably unneeded. It's arcane to me, but I'm
pretty sure autogenerated code can be smarter than it is now.
btw what's against Period(std::string) ?
> P.S. On a related note, how about the hideous 0*Years vs 0*Days thing?
> I'm still shaking from that one :)
I'll get back on this as soon as I'll get more empirical evidences
ciao -- Nando
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev