Posted by
Ferdinando M. Ametrano-3 on
URL: http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/boostify-QL-tp13159p13161.html
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Dima <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> I'm not sure whether we should switch to boost's date library.
Would you please elaborate your point ?
> Also, I
> haven't seen how signals could potentially
> replace observer/observables.
I might be completely wrong here as I'm not familiar about boost
signal/slot, anyway according to wikipedia it's one implementation of
the observer pattern:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_pattern> As a first step, I'd really suggest
> to replace the distribution functions with
> the one in boost. This is I think easy to do and would be the first
> boostification step.
and since I forgot in my first email, please let me add that also the
boost stats classes might be an improvement.
Maybe even a performance improvement in MC when you only need mean and
variance and don't need the higher moments which are calculate in QL
stat classes
ciao -- Nando
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev