Re: unit test

Posted by Kim Kuen Tang on
URL: http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/unit-test-tp13490p13493.html


Hi Luigi,

Luigi Ballabio schrieb:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 22:50 +0200, Kim Kuen Tang wrote:
>  
> Kim,
> it's been a while since I've looked at the Boost unit-test framework,
> so I'm not familiar with the most recent stuff.  Would you suggest
> switching to BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE?  
to be honest, i wont suggest to move to the run-by-name version even the
change is straightforward.
The extra feature that you will gain seems not worth the effort.
Or i didnt need this feature in the past. That is why i am not motivated.

What is your opinion?

Kim
> If so, would you consider writing a
> patch to do that?
>
> Luigi
>
>
>  


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev