http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/QuantLib-SWIG-port-to-Python3-tp14548p14563.html
The relative-import syntax seems to have limitations in Python 2.5. I
> I reviewed your changes and ran the tests in Python 3. Also, thanks for
> updating the examples.
>
> One minor comment I have is that I see some changes in the relative import
> syntax (in QuantLib/__init__.py line 19 - 26). Your implementation
> certainly works, but I am curious why the previous implementation ("import
> .QuantLib [...]") did not work. Due to PEP 328, all major versions of
> Python (including 2.5) should support the prefix dot import syntax, but
> unfortunately, I don't have Python 2.5 on my system to test it. Python 2.7
> worked with the previous implementation.
>
> Anyhow, the above comment is just a minor one. The code works fine as far
> as I can see from the tests in Python 2.7 and 3.3.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Minjae
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Luigi Ballabio <
[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Minjae,
>> I've merged the pull request. I've made a few small changes to
>> ensure compatibility with older versions (such as the ancient Python
>> 2.5, with which QuantLib still works) so please check that I haven't
>> broken anything.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Luigi
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Minjae David Kim <
[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hello Luigi,
>> >
>> > I have accordingly made a pull request on GitHub. I tested the code in
>> > both
>> > Python 2 and Python 3 to ensure that we are maintaining full
>> > compatibility.
>> > If people are using Python, it would be great if they could test the new
>> > code and give feedback.
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Minjae
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Luigi Ballabio
>> > <
[hidden email]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello Minjae,
>> >> yes, it would be great if you contributed your fixes (a pull
>> >> request
>> >> on GitHub would be best, but you can send it in whatever format works
>> >> for
>> >> you). The same goes for the test cases.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Luigi
>> >>
>> >> On Oct 3, 2013 7:01 PM, "Minjae David Kim" <
[hidden email]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>>
>> >>> I was wondering if there is any interest in porting QuantLib-SWIG to
>> >>> work
>> >>> with Python3.x. Currently, it seems to work only with Python2.x.
>> >>>
>> >>> I have done some quick fixes on SWIG interface files so that it works
>> >>> with Python3.x Works well with me so far and passes all the tests.
>> >>> If
>> >>> there is interest, I will be happy to contribute -- please let me
>> >>> know.
>> >>> Also, I was hoping to add more to the test cases.
>> >>>
>> >>> Best Regards,
>> >>> Minjae
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> October Webinars: Code for Performance
>> >>> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
>> >>> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the
>> >>> most
>> >>> from
>> >>> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and
>> >>> register
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> QuantLib-dev mailing list
>> >>>
[hidden email]
>> >>>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev>> >>>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> <
https://implementingquantlib.blogspot.com>
>> <
https://twitter.com/lballabio>
>
>
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >