Hi Francois,did you ever submit this fix? I don't seem to remember it.Or was the problem fixed in another way?LuigiOn Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Francois Botha <[hidden email]> wrote:------------------------------------------------------------------------------Peter,
Here is my first attempt at solving this bug. Can you confirm whether it solves your problem? https://github.com/igitur/quantlib/tree/inflation_reference_period_fix
Francois BothaOn 18 June 2014 17:27, Francois Botha <[hidden email]> wrote:Haha. I actually did read your email the other day, but I didn't make the connection when I discovered the issue now. No fix yet, but I'll see if I can get something together. It will have to involve passing the original reference date through to the fixing algorithm.
FFrancois BothaOn 18 June 2014 17:17, Peter Caspers <[hidden email]> wrote:Hi Francois,
yes, you have to use June's 30 days. This is corresponding to the
question I sent earlier (see below), the second (Murex) way of doing
the interpolation is the correct one.
Do you have a fix for that ? This would be great.
best
Peter
I am comparing Murex and QuantLib concerning Inflation Pricing. I
observe a difference in the way an index fixing is interpolated
between known (i.e. already fixed) values. Here is an example:
Take the EUHICP XT index which has fixings
01.08.2012 (Aug 12) 115.10
01.09.2012 (Sep 12) 115.97
Now I want to look up the fixing on 28.08.2012 belonging to an
observation date on 28.11.2012 (3m observation lag). In QL the
interpolation is done as follows:
Days between 01.08. and 01.09. = 31, Days between 01.08. and 28.08. =
27, Interpolated Fixing = 115.10 + 27/31 * ( 115.97 - 115.10 )
In Murex on the opposite:
Days between 01.11. and 01.12. = 30, Days between 01.11. and 28.11. =
27, Interpolated Fixing = 115.10 + 27/30 * ( 115.97 - 115.10 )
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 18 June 2014 16:50, Francois Botha <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the interpolation in ZeroInflationIndex::fixing isn't exactly
> correctly.
>
> Consider a linearly interpolated Zero Inflation Index with observation lag
> of 4 months. If the reference date is in June, the observation date will be
> in February, which has only 28 days. I believe the interpolation should use
> June's 30 days instead of February's 28 days. As it is, the interpolation
> will be "maxed out" by 28 June and will remain flat until 30 June. Do you
> guys agree?
>
> regards
> Francois Botha
>
> HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions
> Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems
> Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data.
> Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems
> _______________________________________________
> QuantLib-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
>
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
--
| Free forum by Nabble | Disable Popup Ads | Edit this page |