RE: Response from Geotechnical Software Services

Posted by Ferdinando Ametrano-6 on Jan 24, 2001; 11:54am
URL: http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/RE-Response-from-Geotechnical-Software-Services-tp1678p1679.html

Hi all

Gilbert wrote:
>Although copying the HTML code of the list is a matter of seconds, there is
>the disadvantage of maintenance. So to get this done, I we should indeed
>just link to the original list. I'll create an HTML document with that link
>and upload it into the Porject Documentation Area, if that's OK with
>everybody.

I would suggest you post here (in plain text) the summary of the topics
where we have a different opinion. So everybody get a chance to review them.

Then we can submit our changes to Geotechnical for inclusion into their
page. If they accept them we can link to their page, or even better get a
permission to copy their page so to freeze the version we like.

If they reject them we'll just create a page with our modified topics and a
link to their original page.

I'm not enough qualified to fully answer their questions:
 > I am sure you guys have more experience than me regarding
 > copyrights and open source and the various issues in that
 > respect, and I whould be grateful for any advices you could
 > give me regarding the different options I/you have and what
 > this will mean for me, my guide, you and your version of the
 > guide now and in the future.


ciao -- Nando