I have started to debug/test worksheets and things sort of work. Something that I dont understand; is OH working? Why I can not see the instantiation numbering (or whatever you call it) after the object name? Do you see this on MacOS?
Best
Pepe
----- Original Message -----
> Hello again Lars,
> Sorry for the blackout; I was struggling with it and had not much to
> contribute with. But your last branch did help me a lot and save me
> quite a bit of time an effort. A big thank you.
>
> I am building it ok on Linux and running the worksheets. I am
> providing a pedestrian Makefile for it. I can not do it with
> Makefile.oo as it is now. The Makefile is very basic but the idea is
> that eventually both Makefiles merge into a proper am file. It just
> provides a dynamic linked lib and installs it. Prerequisites on the
> environment are the same ones you mention.
>
> There are a couple of differences. I dont install the way you do (my
> system needs sudo for that); I use a component file and my manifest
> file is fixed (this is the only collision I see with your make). Its
> similar to the standard add-in example in the uno sdk. Also the way
> I generate from the idl has a few unnecessary dependences, its also
> taken from the example.
>
> I am adding this into github.com/japari/quantlib/tree/Calc_linuxmake
> This is a branch that I created from the PR you sent to Eric but
> when I uploaded to GitHub it only lets me PR to Erics fork. Can you
> take the changes into your branch please? I prefer that rather than
> issuing a PR to Eric.
>
> Is there anyone working on this on Windows?
>
> Best
> Pepe
>
> My TODO list (comments on Makefile.linux results)
> -Useful functions like OHrangeRetrieveError are missing.
> -At least some functions, if not all, fail when called without all
> arguments given; i.e. there are no default values taken in.
> -Error codes as numbers are ugly.
> -Consider renaming the Add-In service to "QuantLib" ? This might be
> more tidy when looking for a function in the Calc drop down menu.
> -Debug the Makefile dependencies; when launching the Makefile with
> '-j' things go wrong: ...'at times'... theres no ./com/* generation,
> or too late and as a result the f's are not shown. No complains
> about missing includes though....
> -Trim the idl compilation; lots of stuff there not used.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Pepe, changed index.xml to remove inflation dependencies.
> > Eric, pushed anotther version without generated files in Calc
> > directory
> > - do I have to start another pull request or is the old one still
> > active
> > and includes the last changes?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Lars
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2015, 06:19 +0200 schrieb
[hidden email]:
> > > Hi all,
> > > Lars, I have tried your branch and I the AddIn compilation fails
> > > at
> > > the inflation bonds registration so it looks like I need the xml
> > > files you mentioned. Can I have a look at them please? Can you
> > > add
> > > those to github?
> > > Thank you.
> > > Pepe
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > Hi Eric,
> > > >
> > > > set up a pull request against 1.6.
> > > >
> > > > @Pepe: is something missing or does everything work fine for
> > > > you
> > > > (I
> > > > have
> > > > written some more xml files for inflation, model calibration
> > > > etc.
> > > > which
> > > > are not included in this pull request)?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Lars
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2015, 12:57 +0300 schrieb Eric Ehlers:
> > > > > Hi Lars,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is great!
> > > > >
> > > > > Would it be possible for you to send me a pull request for
> > > > > this?
> > > > > If
> > > > > you could do it against my v1.6.x branch then I will include
> > > > > it
> > > > > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > 1.6 release which I am preparing now. Otherwise if you do it
> > > > > against
> > > > > my master then it will go in to 1.7.
> > > > >
> > > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > > Eric
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:05:55 +0200
> > > > > Lars Callenbach <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have extended the addin code for the LibreOffice calc
> > > > > > plugin.
> > > > > > Changes: 1) vetor return values (iteration over std::vector
> > > > > > results)
> > > > > > 2) return type seqseq(ANY) for all addin functions to
> > > > > > provide
> > > > > > addin
> > > > > > access to exceptions (exception messages will be displayed
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > cells)
> > > > > > 3) implementation of default value handling
> > > > > > (ANY::hasValue()
> > > > > > function)
> > > > > > 4) works clean with dynamic libraries (and with static
> > > > > > linking)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have changed a lot of XML config files and some python
> > > > > > files
> > > > > > for the
> > > > > > calc addin and I suggest to include my changes in the
> > > > > > official
> > > > > > code.
> > > > > > How shall we proceed to include these changes in the
> > > > > > official
> > > > > > version? Who is responsible for the maintenance of the calc
> > > > > > code?
> > > > > > Can
> > > > > > I help maintaining the calc code?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The generated code is available under
> > > > > > "
https://www.callenbach.eu".
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Lars
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> QuantLib-dev mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
>