Oh, right, it was you for Solaris as well. It's good to have an archaeologist around :)
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:28 Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:I second Dirk that we probably shouldn't put much effort in making that code compile. However, we can disable it so that the build succeeds, even if the resulting library will miss a few features. In fact, I did the same thing recently for an older Solaris compiler. May you try running configure as
./configure CXXFLAGS='-DQL_PATCH_SOLARIS'
and see if you get to the end of the build?
Luigi
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:16 Dirk Eddelbuettel <[hidden email]> wrote:
On 19 April 2017 at 00:23, shailesh kumar wrote:
| Hi Luigi,
|
| I tried compiling preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 as available at <
| https://sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test > on OEL 6.7 (Oracle Linux
| Server release 6.7)
| using gcc34/g++34 version gcc34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6)/
| g++34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6) along with Boost version
| 1.62.0
|
| I am getting below compilation error.
|
| ../../../ql/experimental/math/tcopulapolicy.hpp:134: instantiated from here
| /scratch/ofsaadb/build/CAP802_JAVA7_O12C/BOOSTNEW/include/ boost/math/tools/
| roots.hpp:68: error: no matching function for call to `get(const
| boost::fusion::tuple<long double, long double, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_>&)'
| make[3]: *** [gaussianlhplossmodel.lo] Error 1
| make[3]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental/
| credit'
| make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental'
| make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql'
| make: *** [all] Error 2
|
| Request to please help me resolving this issue.
| This works if i use gcc/g++ version 4.4.7 compiler but fails for gcc34/g++34
I hope you do realize that gcc 3.4 was released _eleven_ years ago.
Even 4.4.* is pretty ancient at an age of five years.
Dirk
|
|
| Regards
| Shailesh Kumar
|
|
|
|
| On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]>
| wrote:
|
| Hi all,
| preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 are available at <https://
| sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test > (no docs yet, but most
| changes are listed at https://github.com/lballabio/QuantLib/milestone/5 ?
| closed=1). Please download them and try them out if you have a few cycles
| available.
|
| Thanks,
| Luigi
|
|
|
| ----------------------------------------------------------- -
| ------------------
| Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
| engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
| _______________________________________________
| QuantLib-users mailing list
| [hidden email]
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib- users
|
|
|
| ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------
| Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
| engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
| _______________________________________________
| QuantLib-users mailing list
| [hidden email]
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [hidden email]
Free forum by Nabble | Disable Popup Ads | Edit this page |