Posted by
quantlib-dev mailing list on
Jul 05, 2017; 5:47am
URL: http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/Re-Quantlib-users-Removing-Boost-dependency-from-QuantLib-tp18400.html
Hello Everyone,
I just tried the SWIG Python binding with QuantLib-noBoost, and I found the Python binding works after little amount of modification (all test cases pass). My modified SWIG codes are here:
https://github.com/haozhangphd/QuantLib-noBoost-SWIG.
I only tried the Python binding, but I suppose other languages should also work.
Best Regards,
Hao
On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 1:44:24 PM MDT Hao Zhang via QuantLib-users wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I have removed all Boost dependency from QuantLib, and ported QuantLib to
> C++17. The code is hosted on GitHub
> (
https://github.com/haozhangphd/QuantLib-noBoost).
>
> The ported code passes all test cases with no performance penalty. There are
> significant performance improvements in SOME functionalities. The total
> running time of the whole test suite is shorter by ~10% after Boost is
> removed.
>
> I will continue maintaining this project, and regularly backport latest
> commits from QuantLib. I will also make this project work on other
> compilers besides GCC in the near future.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Hao
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
http://sdm.link/slashdot> _______________________________________________
> QuantLib-users mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev