Re: AW: libXLL (and its QuantLib usage)

Posted by Ferdinando M. Ametrano-2 on
URL: http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/libXLL-and-its-QuantLib-usage-tp2428p2430.html

At 06:37 PM 3/6/2003 +0100, Jens Thiel wrote:
>While you prefer the "multithreaded DLL" settings
>(maybe for smaller executables?), I prefer the "multithreaded" setting for
>less dependencies and easier deployment ( I do not have to ship the
>MFC*.DLLs since the code is already linked into the executable).
>[...] Well, I tried to explain this a few times. Still failed :-(((
Not this time. I finally got your point, and me too I would prefer the
multithread setting instead of "multithread DLL". You made me realize why 2
years ago when I was in Frankfurt to deploy a product I had to request my
collegues in Milan to send me some MSXXX.dll that was missing on the target
machine ;-)

The only problem is that I've been unable to compile cppunit (the QuantLib
unit test framework) in "multithread". I will investigate that and as soon
as I solve this problem I would switch to "multithread" from "multithread
DLL", if everybody agree


------------
ciao -- Nando