Re: Re: QuantLib, Java (C#), and SWIG

Posted by Ferdinando M. Ametrano-3 on
URL: http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/JAVA-Sub-project-tp3355p3358.html

Hi all

David Wan wrote:
>1. A JNI based Java program is not as realiable as a pure one: it has
>much more chances to crash (JVM abnormal halt) than a pure one.
>[...]
>5. If Quantlib can be implemented using Java with same(similar)
>interfaces and functionalities of the C++ version, there will be fun.
I agree

Jimmy Freese wrote:
>I'm not interestd in getting getting a thread of Java
>vs. C++, or Ford vs Chevy or Bush vs Kerry or even Bud
>Light vs Coors
nobody is interested in such a thread :)

>just wondering if some java developers
>are interested in a java quant lib, like David Wan is.
>
>I'm interested in helping on this one.
>
>Let's make it happen.

Go ahead! I was wondering about SWIG just out of curiosity, it wasn't
intended to be a "JVM abnormal halt"

ciao -- Nando