Re: [Quantlib-dev] Interpolator semantics

Posted by Joseph Wang on
URL: http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/Interpolator-semantics-tp4212p4219.html

I see your point.  You can go ahead and remove it.  You might have to
fix some places where that is used.

Also, what is your opinion about using transform in sampled curve.

One other thing, has anyone ever done an interactive code review online?


Luigi Ballabio wrote:

>
> On 11/15/2005 07:25:57 PM, Joseph Wang wrote:
>
>>>
>> It's because I want to set extrapolate to true.  At first I thought  
>> it would be easy to add it to C++ class, but that would break the  
>> bridge pattern.
>
>
> Joseph,
>     it's done. You can check out the modified code and look at the  
> relevant test case in test-suite/interpolations.cpp to see how to  
> enable extrapolation.
>
> On an unrelated note, I'm not sure that the transform() method you  
> added really belongs to Array, since a) it just wraps a call to  
> std::transform, b) it is less flexible, being only self-applied while  
> std::transform allows writing to a different output array, and c) I'd  
> like to keep class interfaces as lean as possible. Would it be a
> major  inconvenience for you if I took it back?
>
> Later,
>     Luigi
>
> ----------------------------------------
>
> The shortest way to do many things is to do only one thing at once.
> -- Samuel Smiles