Posted by
Luigi Ballabio on
Apr 18, 2007; 3:02pm
URL: http://quantlib.414.s1.nabble.com/Re-QuantLib-svn-SF-net-SVN-quantlib-10219-trunk-QuantLib-tp9378.html
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 06:46 -0700,
[hidden email] wrote:
> Revision: 10219
>
http://quantlib.svn.sourceforge.net/quantlib/?rev=10219&view=rev> Author: nando
> Date: 2007-04-18 06:46:40 -0700 (Wed, 18 Apr 2007)
>
> Log Message:
> -----------
> evolvers classified in their own folder tree, depending on rate type (fwd, cotswap, cmswap) and dynamic (normal, lognormal)
Aren't we going a bit too far? I mean, there's one evolver per subfolder
right now---with some subfolders being empty, too. At this point, this
much structure looks to me like a burden more than a help---especially
since using Doxygen, we can easily generate a reference page where all
the evolvers are listed and where it is stated whether each one is
normal/lognormal and what rate type they evolve.
Thoughts?
Luigi
----------------------------------------
What is written without effort is, in general, read without pleasure.
-- Samuel Johnson
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev