Well I just build the test-suite in VC 7 and the randomized lattice
rules all passed the test. Do you have more colour on this, Klaus? regards Mark -- LIbor market model training courses in London and Sydney www.markjoshi.com Assoc Prof Mark Joshi Centre for Actuarial Studies University of Melbourne My website is www.markjoshi.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 10:43 +1100, Mark joshi wrote: > Well I just build the test-suite in VC 7 and the randomized lattice > rules all passed the test. Yes, they do. The error happens only once in a while. Maybe it's statistics---I mean, if one runs it enough times, it's bound to eventually exceed the given tolerance. Is this possible? Luigi -- I'd never join any club that would have the likes of me as a member. -- Groucho Marx ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
I think the issue is that it uses Mersenne to randomize which uses
time to set the seed. So most of the time it passes but once in a while it fails. This is essentially correct behaviour but annoying. I'm thinking the best solution is to set the seed in the Mersenne manually. Mark On 15/11/2007, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 10:43 +1100, Mark joshi wrote: > > Well I just build the test-suite in VC 7 and the randomized lattice > > rules all passed the test. > > Yes, they do. The error happens only once in a while. Maybe it's > statistics---I mean, if one runs it enough times, it's bound to > eventually exceed the given tolerance. Is this possible? > > Luigi > > > -- > > I'd never join any club that would have the likes of me as a member. > -- Groucho Marx > > > -- LIbor market model training courses in London and Sydney www.markjoshi.com Assoc Prof Mark Joshi Centre for Actuarial Studies University of Melbourne My website is www.markjoshi.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |