Black-Scholes overvaluing/undervaluing?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Black-Scholes overvaluing/undervaluing?

rm-22
Hi,
somewhere I read that Black-Scholes Model would apparently
have a problem of overvaluing deep out-of-the-money calls
and undervaluing deep in-the-money calls.
I'm not sure if that is really the case.
Can someone confirm this, with maybe a practical example?
Thx


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Black-Scholes overvaluing/undervaluing?

Dimathematician
There's nothing wrong with Black-Scholes here. I think what you mean
might be the calculation of deep out-of-the-money call prices from
implied volatilities. The same for in-the-money. Yes there are
numerical issues here, as the precision of the normal cdf gets
worse since it is numerically calculated


2009/9/13 Ralf M. <[hidden email]>
Hi,
somewhere I read that Black-Scholes Model would apparently
have a problem of overvaluing deep out-of-the-money calls
and undervaluing deep in-the-money calls.
I'm not sure if that is really the case.
Can someone confirm this, with maybe a practical example?
Thx


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Black-Scholes overvaluing/undervaluing?

Luigi Ballabio
In reply to this post by rm-22
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 17:53 +0200, Ralf M. wrote:
> somewhere I read that Black-Scholes Model would apparently
> have a problem of overvaluing deep out-of-the-money calls
> and undervaluing deep in-the-money calls.
> I'm not sure if that is really the case.

Would that be QuantLib's implementation, or Black-Scholes itself?

Luigi


--

Testing can never demonstrate the absence of errors in software, only
their presence.
-- W.E. Dijkstra



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users