Hi, is there any developer out there planning to contribute a CDS / bond curves (using reduced form approach)? I wouldn't want to duplicate any work.
Cheers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
Hi Simon
> is there any developer out there planning to contribute a CDS / bond > curves (using reduced form approach)? I wouldn't want to duplicate any work. not anyone I know of. Go ahead: I look forward to your contribution. ciao -- Nando ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
In reply to this post by Simon Ibbotson
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 14:18 +0100, Simon Ibbotson wrote:
> Hi, is there any developer out there planning to contribute a CDS / > bond curves (using reduced form approach)? I wouldn't want to > duplicate any work. There might be a contribution shortly. I don't think that it uses reduced form approach, but it should at least define a base interface for the default-probability curve. I'll get back as soon as I know for sure. Luigi -- Use every man after his desert, and who shall scape whipping? -- Hamlet, Act II, scene II ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
Luigi,
Any further notice on this? If anyone is developing this at present, I'll wait a bit for a well thought out base class interface - but sometimes it's best just to go with a simple one.
The simplest (I feel) would be one with the basic functions:
virtual QL_Real NpvNoDefault(const Cashflow& Payment, const Date& StartDate, const Date& EndDate) const = 0;
virtual QL_Real NpvGivenDefault(const Cashflow& Payment, const Date& StartDate, const Date& EndDate) const = 0;
You might also want to add another parameter that makes explicit whether a default on the end date is included.
This interface allows for stochastic default-intensity and stochastic interest-rates. I've not worked with firm-value models, so don't know how this interface would hold up. It also specialises for single-name credit - multiple names would require a different interface (
e.g. expected remaining notional for an ITraxx curve).
However, if anyone is working on this and has a better concept, please let me know...
Simon
On 9/26/07, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 14:18 +0100, Simon Ibbotson wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |