Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Hi,
You guys now have analytical and tree pricers with
the use of your new InterestRateModelling
framework. Do you guys tend to integrate this
with your MonteCarlo framework too?
Please say yes!!
By the way, your stuff does not complie against
VC++7. Looks like Microsoft have changed all the
template logic again... Have fun.
Toy.
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
Hi,
I have no idea as I'm purely a microsoft
developer.
However because QuantLib uses STL heavily, I would
suspect that any version
of borland which is ANSI compliant and has full
support for STL
(I don't think this includes rougewaves version)
should work.
But this is probably a question for the QuantLib
boys...
Toy.
... [show rest of quote]
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:[hidden email]>George Smith >To: <mailto:[hidden email]>Toyin Akin >Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 7:29 PM >Subject: RE: [Quantlib-users] Monte Carlo with InterestRate Modelling... > >Can someone tell me what is the oldest (if any) borland C++ that >quantlib will compile and run on. >thanks >grs George, I'm routinely using QuantLib with the free Borland command-line compiler version 5.5.1. I'm afraid I don't know whether it compiles with older ones. But as Toyin pointed out, a certain level of compliance with the standard is required. Then again, maybe not that much, since Visual C++ 6 compiles :) Bye, Luigi |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
In reply to this post by Toyin Akin-3
At 07:14 PM 3/11/02 +0000, Toyin Akin wrote:
>You guys now have analytical and tree pricers with the use of your new >InterestRateModelling >framework. Do you guys tend to integrate this with your MonteCarlo >framework too? >Please say yes!! Let's say "eventually". >By the way, your stuff does not complie against VC++7. Looks like >Microsoft have changed all the >template logic again... Have fun. Can you provide the list of errors/warnings? You can send it to me directly so that we don't pollute the list. I'm not that worried, though. I hope they just made their compiler more compliant, not less, so that it should be enough to change a few macros we had to introduce to work around VC6 lack of compliance. Bye, Luigi |
Free forum by Nabble | Disable Popup Ads | Edit this page |