Hi again,
I've been reading, studying and once again thinking about all that's been said, as well as my original question on a total Delta for a CapFloor. The conclusion I've come to is as follows: It's confusing to talk about 'Delta' on a Cap/Floor instrument, seeing as it is a portfolio of options. What I'm looking for is a 'Hedge ratio' for a Cap/Floor using a Swap instrument. This is very simply the ratio between the Cap/Floor's sensitivity to a 1bp move in the underlying termstructure versus the same on a Swap with an EQUIVALENT structure (not assuming this is the underlying for the Cap/Floor - just a strip of FRA's with the same STRUCTURE as that of the Cap/Floor). Xavier, is that not exactly what you were saying? I think this has cleared it up for me, please feel free to burst my bubble if you differ! Andre ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential and privileged, proprietary to the company and protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of our company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. |
Andre,
I agree entirely. Best Regards, Toyin Akin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Louw" <[hidden email]> To: "QuantlibUsers (E-mail)" <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:45 AM Subject: [Quantlib-users] RE:Delta on CapFloor (Final?) > Hi again, > > I've been reading, studying and once again thinking about all that's been > said, as well as my original question on a total Delta for a CapFloor. The > conclusion I've come to is as follows: > > It's confusing to talk about 'Delta' on a Cap/Floor instrument, seeing as it > is a portfolio of options. What I'm looking for is a 'Hedge ratio' for a > Cap/Floor using a Swap instrument. This is very simply the ratio between the > Cap/Floor's sensitivity to a 1bp move in the underlying termstructure versus > the same on a Swap with an EQUIVALENT structure (not assuming this is the > underlying for the Cap/Floor - just a strip of FRA's with the same STRUCTURE > as that of the Cap/Floor). > > Xavier, is that not exactly what you were saying? > > I think this has cleared it up for me, please feel free to burst my bubble > if you differ! > > Andre > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This e-mail is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named > above and may contain information that is confidential and privileged, > proprietary to the company and protected by law. If you are not the > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Opinions, conclusions and > other information in this message that do not relate to the official > business of our company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by > it. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of > Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) > program now. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v? > http://www.sun.com/javavote > _______________________________________________ > Quantlib-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users |
In reply to this post by Andre Louw-2
Actually to make things even more confusing...!!
Sure a Trader may hedge a 2y cap with a 2y swap, however Traders can also hedge their whole portfolio of caps (could be a mixture of any cap structure) with just a 10y swap. This is so that they may simply transform this into a 10y bond to hedge. Basically, choose your hedge instrument(s) first, then compute the hedge. Regards, Toyin Akin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Louw" <[hidden email]> To: "QuantlibUsers (E-mail)" <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:45 AM Subject: [Quantlib-users] RE:Delta on CapFloor (Final?) > Hi again, > > I've been reading, studying and once again thinking about all that's been > said, as well as my original question on a total Delta for a CapFloor. The > conclusion I've come to is as follows: > > It's confusing to talk about 'Delta' on a Cap/Floor instrument, seeing as it > is a portfolio of options. What I'm looking for is a 'Hedge ratio' for a > Cap/Floor using a Swap instrument. This is very simply the ratio between the > Cap/Floor's sensitivity to a 1bp move in the underlying termstructure versus > the same on a Swap with an EQUIVALENT structure (not assuming this is the > underlying for the Cap/Floor - just a strip of FRA's with the same STRUCTURE > as that of the Cap/Floor). > > Xavier, is that not exactly what you were saying? > > I think this has cleared it up for me, please feel free to burst my bubble > if you differ! > > Andre > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This e-mail is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named > above and may contain information that is confidential and privileged, > proprietary to the company and protected by law. If you are not the > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Opinions, conclusions and > other information in this message that do not relate to the official > business of our company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by > it. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of > Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) > program now. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v? > http://www.sun.com/javavote > _______________________________________________ > Quantlib-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users |
In reply to this post by Andre Louw-2
Sorry about all these emails again, but one further point...
You say a swap with an EQUIVALENT structure. What would be more accurate is a swap with an EQUIVALENT delta. Remember, you could hedge the who cap with just a single Futures contract. Certainly different structures here. Regards, Toyin Akin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Louw" <[hidden email]> To: "QuantlibUsers (E-mail)" <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:45 AM Subject: [Quantlib-users] RE:Delta on CapFloor (Final?) > Hi again, > > I've been reading, studying and once again thinking about all that's been > said, as well as my original question on a total Delta for a CapFloor. The > conclusion I've come to is as follows: > > It's confusing to talk about 'Delta' on a Cap/Floor instrument, seeing as it > is a portfolio of options. What I'm looking for is a 'Hedge ratio' for a > Cap/Floor using a Swap instrument. This is very simply the ratio between the > Cap/Floor's sensitivity to a 1bp move in the underlying termstructure versus > the same on a Swap with an EQUIVALENT structure (not assuming this is the > underlying for the Cap/Floor - just a strip of FRA's with the same STRUCTURE > as that of the Cap/Floor). > > Xavier, is that not exactly what you were saying? > > I think this has cleared it up for me, please feel free to burst my bubble > if you differ! > > Andre > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This e-mail is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named > above and may contain information that is confidential and privileged, > proprietary to the company and protected by law. If you are not the > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Opinions, conclusions and > other information in this message that do not relate to the official > business of our company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by > it. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of > Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) > program now. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v? > http://www.sun.com/javavote > _______________________________________________ > Quantlib-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users |
In reply to this post by Andre Louw-2
Hi Andre,
yes this is better said than me and exactly what you have to do: take the hedge ratio to know the amount of swap to hedge your cap. Of course you can also search the amount of "callable bond double knock in/out barrier" to hedge a cap but this is not standard at all. The most common is to hedge with the instruments you find in your curve : money market , futures and swaps. Bye Xavier Andre Louw <[hidden email]> To: "QuantlibUsers (E-mail)" <[hidden email]> Sent by: cc: [hidden email] Subject: [Quantlib-users] RE:Delta on CapFloor (Final?) eforge.net 22/10/2002 09:45 Hi again, I've been reading, studying and once again thinking about all that's been said, as well as my original question on a total Delta for a CapFloor. The conclusion I've come to is as follows: It's confusing to talk about 'Delta' on a Cap/Floor instrument, seeing as it is a portfolio of options. What I'm looking for is a 'Hedge ratio' for a Cap/Floor using a Swap instrument. This is very simply the ratio between the Cap/Floor's sensitivity to a 1bp move in the underlying termstructure versus the same on a Swap with an EQUIVALENT structure (not assuming this is the underlying for the Cap/Floor - just a strip of FRA's with the same STRUCTURE as that of the Cap/Floor). Xavier, is that not exactly what you were saying? I think this has cleared it up for me, please feel free to burst my bubble if you differ! Andre ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential and privileged, proprietary to the company and protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of our company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v? http://www.sun.com/javavote _______________________________________________ Quantlib-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users ************************************************************************* Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont confidentiels et etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisee est interdite. Tout message electronique est susceptible d'alteration. La Fimat et ses filiales declinent toute responsabilite au titre de ce message s'il a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. ******** This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Neither Fimat nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates shall be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. ************************************************************************* |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |