Roadmap to QuantLib 1.0
Locked
 
|
Hi all, now that 0.3.14 is out, I'd like to float around a couple of ideas on how to get to a 1.0 release during 2007. Feel free to throw in your comments. First: next release will complete the implementation of the Libor market model we're developing with Mark Joshi. I'd use this occasion to leave the 0.3 series and go to 0.4.0. This one might act as a stable release until 1.0 comes out (which means that depending on request and on the number of bugs we find, we might think of getting out a bug-fix only 0.4.1 based on the 0.4.0 branch.) Second: After a stable 0.4.0 is out, I'd grab the chance to make any non-backward-compatible change we might need before 1.0 (I can think of a few.) I'd also switch the repository to Subversion, which would make it easier to move stuff around. The resulting release would be a candidate for 1.0---I'm open to suggestions as to whether to call it 0.9.0 or 1.0b1, i.e., as to which version number would possibly lure more people into downloading it and trying it out. Shortly thereafter, I would put out the actual 1.0 release. Thoughts? Luigi ---------------------------------------- Quote me as saying I was misquoted. -- Groucho Marx |
|
|
Hi Luigi,
from what I've heart from some friends of mine is that they would appreciate to have more documentation. Doesn't need to be a complete text book;-) What about setting up a documentation plan for 1.0? cheers Klaus On Tuesday 07 November 2006 12:48 pm, Luigi Ballabio wrote: > Hi all, > now that 0.3.14 is out, I'd like to float around a couple of ideas on > how to get to a 1.0 release during 2007. Feel free to throw in your > comments. > > First: next release will complete the implementation of the Libor market > model we're developing with Mark Joshi. I'd use this occasion to leave > the 0.3 series and go to 0.4.0. This one might act as a stable release > until 1.0 comes out (which means that depending on request and on the > number of bugs we find, we might think of getting out a bug-fix only > 0.4.1 based on the 0.4.0 branch.) > > Second: After a stable 0.4.0 is out, I'd grab the chance to make any > non-backward-compatible change we might need before 1.0 (I can think of > a few.) I'd also switch the repository to Subversion, which would make > it easier to move stuff around. The resulting release would be a > candidate for 1.0---I'm open to suggestions as to whether to call it > 0.9.0 or 1.0b1, i.e., as to which version number would possibly lure > more people into downloading it and trying it out. > > Shortly thereafter, I would put out the actual 1.0 release. > > Thoughts? > > Luigi > > > ---------------------------------------- > > Quote me as saying I was misquoted. > -- Groucho Marx > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache > Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > QuantLib-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Luigi Ballabio
Would it be possible to include benchmarking in 1.0? I'm thinking of data set + parameter settings that go beyond the simple functional tests. Alan King Math Sciences IBM Thomas J Watson Research Center 914-945-1236 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/k/kingaj/
Hi all, now that 0.3.14 is out, I'd like to float around a couple of ideas on how to get to a 1.0 release during 2007. Feel free to throw in your comments. First: next release will complete the implementation of the Libor market model we're developing with Mark Joshi. I'd use this occasion to leave the 0.3 series and go to 0.4.0. This one might act as a stable release until 1.0 comes out (which means that depending on request and on the number of bugs we find, we might think of getting out a bug-fix only 0.4.1 based on the 0.4.0 branch.) Second: After a stable 0.4.0 is out, I'd grab the chance to make any non-backward-compatible change we might need before 1.0 (I can think of a few.) I'd also switch the repository to Subversion, which would make it easier to move stuff around. The resulting release would be a candidate for 1.0---I'm open to suggestions as to whether to call it 0.9.0 or 1.0b1, i.e., as to which version number would possibly lure more people into downloading it and trying it out. Shortly thereafter, I would put out the actual 1.0 release. Thoughts? Luigi ---------------------------------------- Quote me as saying I was misquoted. -- Groucho Marx ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Luigi Ballabio
Luigi,
I would a more powerful cash flow generation for Bonds (and other cash flow instruments). This is something I could help you guys. Regards. ---- Mensagem Original ---- From: "Luigi Ballabio" <[hidden email]> To: "QuantLib developers" <[hidden email]> Sent: Ter, Novembro 7, 2006 9:48 am Subject: [Quantlib-dev] Roadmap to QuantLib 1.0 Hi all, now that 0.3.14 is out, I'd like to float around a couple of ideas on how to get to a 1.0 release during 2007. Feel free to throw in your comments. First: next release will complete the implementation of the Libor market model we're developing with Mark Joshi. I'd use this occasion to leave the 0.3 series and go to 0.4.0. This one might act as a stable release until 1.0 comes out (which means that depending on request and on the number of bugs we find, we might think of getting out a bug-fix only 0.4.1 based on the 0.4.0 branch.) Second: After a stable 0.4.0 is out, I'd grab the chance to make any non-backward-compatible change we might need before 1.0 (I can think of a few.) I'd also switch the repository to Subversion, which would make it easier to move stuff around. The resulting release would be a candidate for 1.0---I'm open to suggestions as to whether to call it 0.9.0 or 1.0b1, i.e., as to which version number would possibly lure more people into downloading it and trying it out. Shortly thereafter, I would put out the actual 1.0 release. Thoughts? Luigi ---------------------------------------- Quote me as saying I was misquoted. -- Groucho Marx ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ QuantLib-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev |
«
Return to quantlib-dev
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |